… You are on the level of understanding where you understand the meaning
of the word “existence” in the same way that you understand that the carpet,
chair, body, earth, mountain, relations, and the power of the senses exist.
So when you hear that “the world does not exist,” you remain on this same
level with which you were knowing the meaning of existence. Whereas he
[“English” Jonty] has expressed his realization of the meaning of the
existence of the ring: the ring does not exist, gold exists. So the ring
is a form. As long as he did not understand that gold exists, for him
the ring was a separate something, a form, and gold was separate. In the
same way, as long as you have not understood that the Self exists, Existence
exists, then for you, the world is a form.
Some people are so fixed that someone exists. If I tell such a person
that they never exist, he cannot understand. Why? He has not worked to
expand or unfold the purity of intellect, which is there. How did Jonty
understand? He is also an intellectual, mental, or human being. How did
he understand that form does not exist? If that awareness has come, then
he will understand that England does not exist. But for someone else,
the world exists, England exists, her mother exists, and her brother does
not exist. So what do we do? We accept this. When you know that your brother
does not exist, your mother exists, that you yourself exist, I say, “Yes.”
You are on the same level of understanding that the ring exists. So Jonty
is right, I give this example of the ring and gold very often, just to
let Dikpal know, because for Dikpal and others the ring also
exists. I don’t know if the ring exists for him now or not?
Dikpal: No way.
Swamiji: Thank you. Then he’s free. … Let me know, is a ring chocolate?
Wood? Cloth? A friend? Mommy? Daddy? A husband? A wife? What is a ring
to the gold? Gold exists. That is where it is not known to you that the
Self exists. For you, the world exists and the Self does not exist. It
is totally opposite. When I’m saying that the world does not exist, it
means that you should be opened to understand, “Oh my goodness, where
is my intellect?” I say to you that the wave does not exist, ocean water
exists. That you understand, because ocean water is visible. It has proof,
for after some time, the wave is not. Then you know, “Oh yeah, it was
water.” …
Like “Jonty,” his name, does not exist. He can understand this. It was
not there. But he will not understand that the body does not exist. That’s
called bad intellect. Now, I have to accept it. Bad intellect does not
mean that it does not exist. It exists—whether bad or good, it doesn’t
matter. I say bad because you do not get the point with the same intellect.
When with the same intellect you get the point—that you are the Self,
Pure Free Forever—then it is called good intellect, or it is not the type
of intellect that it used to be.
That is where a human being is. So we sometimes use other words. We say,
“Check your I. Does I exist?” It’s not that I want you to answer like
small children in school. I want you to use your intellect. Because you
have it. And you are sure that the intellect is—the mind is, the intellect
is, I am, all that. Then I say, “Suppose you say your I exists.” You answer,
“Well, I feel it.” Then I remain quiet—because I also feel it. You also
feel it. Everyone feels it. That means you depend on your feelings. That
is what you are taught: “Express your feelings. Express your feelings.
What do you feel now? What do you feel now?” In every situation, you are
asked, “What do you feel now?”
You have understood my point, whatever I was saying. If you have understood,
then I will not say that you will understand. So wherever the problem
is, it does not exist. Why? The problem would exist if you exist. You
do not exist. That is where we use this point of existence and non-existence—for
you, those who are totally fixed and unrealized—so that they should at
least immediately get opened that, “My goodness, I’m worried about my
car having an accident. The car does not exist. So what accident of what?”
…
This is where you will know that if the body does not exist, then you
will never worry about you. Otherwise, when you’re hungry and it’s a little
late for your breakfast, you’re upset. You’re uptight about everything.
You will remain uptight. You cannot have any peace, because for you, every
problem exists. A problem means that your intellect does not understand:
then it’s a problem. And you will reach a point that understands every-thing:
because “thing” is not there, so why should it not understand? But that
will happen only if you are on that level. If there are things and forms
and this and this, then there is Jonty.
The intellect is either a good intellect or a bad intellect. But we do
not use the words “good” and “bad,” we speak of intellect. We say you
have the best intellect. Whenever I have to say you are not yet fully
grown up, then I say you have the best intellect. [Laughter.] Why? You
cause suffering to you. … Every type of person is there. Those people
who have the sharpest intellect make themselves miserable. See the words:
I said they have the sharpest intellect but they make themselves miserable;
they must be the most stupid. [Laughter.] But I’m using the words “sharp
intellect,” because I have to keep you in the Space—in the same state,
wherever you are. So it is being done. People are being educated, but
they can’t get the point made by elders. Such as if it is said, “The boss
never exists,” then you keep working in the office or anywhere but you
know, “Boss or no boss, who bothers? The boss never exists.” So far as
work is concerned, you have to do it, because of activity.
In this way, now try to grasp your standard of understanding. I’ll speak
of your vision, or the sight of your eyes. You are closing your eyes,
but I’ll say “In your sight, the whole world exists.” The person who has
a good intellect will understand. In this way I’ll say, “In the seed,
the whole tree exists.” This you can understand, because many times you
have seen a seed. Many times you have sowed a seed and a plant came, a
tree came, a big tree came, so you can understand this. But in that small
seed, how can such a big tree exist? Therefore I say things, but if you
have no ability to get the real meaning of my words, then whatever words
I’m using (because they are to be used), that you will understand, and
according to that understanding, you will work.
But I understand that you need liberation. You need freedom—from all
kinds of sickness and suffering. Now if this is so, then you will never
be liberated if you are dependent on your I. So what do I say now? I’m
saying that “I” should not be treated as there. Then you will never be
dependent. But you call I the mind, then whatever the mind thinks but
it doesn’t happen, the next moment…! Such persons are there that when
whatever they decide doesn’t happen, then and there they feel bad.
That’s why we say to study. If you know the functioning of the mind as
well as of things and forms, that’s called vairaagya. … But you
do not get the real meaning of the word vairaagya, although the
word is very useful. For you call it renunciation. Now, if you only use
this meaning, you can never apply it. A big apple came to me from Manu.
He felt good, I felt good, and whoever gave it to him felt good. Now it
is sitting here. Someone will say, “He cannot eat this big apple, especially
when he does not have his dentures; even if he has them, he cannot crush
it. But why does he have the apple? Why does he not part with it? Why
is it that he can’t renounce it—why didn’t he then and there, when Manu
brought it? Why could he not give it back to him? So, he’s attached.”
And I’ll know it and say, “Yes, I’m attached.” Why? I’m not dependent
on your thinking. And I’m not dependent on my thinking.
Dikpal’s question sometimes is, “Swamiji, I have a mind, you have a mind,
everyone has a mind, and you do well with the mind. What kind of mind
is this that you have?” Then I have to concoct some word for him, so I
say, “I have a mind, you have a mind, everyone has a mind, but my mind
is Guru mind.” Then he’ll say, “Whatever he does, I’ll also do like that.”
But it doesn’t work. So what kind of mind is that which I’m hinting at?
It’s only Pure Consciousness—which has millions of rays of the power of
thinking. But it is free. Even though the whole world with varieties of
things exists in it, but vision is free. A human being does not understand
this. He says, “Suppose the world exists in vision, then vision should
be upset at every step—when things go bad and things go.” That is called
a not advanced intellect.
So the point that Jonty brought in clearly conveys that today he has
understood that form does not exist. Then, what exists? In the case of
a ring, the ring-form does not exist, gold exists. But when for you gold
is form, then you cannot say that gold does not exist. Whenever gold will
come, you’ll grab it. This is where the meaning of form and no form is.
So we use many styles of digging something from your own brilliance. …
There is one criterion. Any time you feel upset, treat it bad intellect
has come. It’s very simple. If you know you have realized the Self, then
no problem of being upset will come. Because the knowledge, the Self,
is such it is not even a dream; it’s not even the waking state, let alone
deep sleep. And a human being has the capacity or power to one day understand
this. But before he understands, he gets sick, cancer, a disease, or somebody’s
knee is a problem, like Shaarda’s and Turiya’s, or Aatma’s back, or Manoraama’s
hands. Examples are there, but you don’t think you have anything to do
with them. Why is it that when something happens to your body, then that
something has to do with you? When you know form does not exist, it’s
any kind. When your tape recorder has no battery, you’re not upset. You
go to the other room, bring the battery, and once again you are ready.
… When you close your eyes, only then you come to know “The whole world
exists in me.” If it exists in me and you come to know this, then why
are you very dear to you and the world becomes non-dear to you? Your intellect
will be even. …
I’m not meant to make you listen so that you should execute the words
I say. I just talk, thinking you do not exist. [Laughter.] But she [Osnat]
does not know this, so she says, “I want to listen to you.” Because she
is convinced that I exist. That is the problem. … Your ears listen to
me, and my mouth speaks to your ears. Where is the question of I—I, a
disciple and I, a Guru? But you cannot leave your I. So you have to make
some relation. That is the world. People in the world live life dependant
on the I with which they should relate. So it should be a relative I.
I is your relation. And that relationship is with your body. The body
and I are related together—not only related, I says “The body is me.”
And the body says, “Yes, I is the body.” They got like that. It’s called
attachment. And it is based on ignorance. If ignorance remains, then knowledge
cannot work.
Have you not seen your eyes? In the night, they have capability or strength
enough not to see anything. But when the sun comes, where does this strength
go away. [He snaps his fingers.] So when knowledge comes, where is your
previous ignorance? That’s why you say a shift took place. A shift took
place, but you think, “A shift took place in me” So again, the I is there.
So many times a shift took place, but I’m just the same. [Laughter.] …
It’s very easy to be free: that which binds you, give it up. That’s all.
Binding is a power. If binding power is powerful as against the power
of your freedom, then you are doomed. So we are all seeking—in a very
big way through all scriptures, and knowledge, and time and space—only
one thing: you want to attain the power of freedom as against the power
of bondage. This cannot be explained and it makes no sense. Then we speak
of the mind: mind is the power that makes you miserable, that binds you,
because you are identified. The senses are powerful that they bind you.
But the main thing is a human being is like this. In him the power is
such that it is binding him so powerfully to be human. And he wishes that
he should use the power of freedom that should say “You have never been
human.” That is the thing. If that has not yet come, then you have to
patch up. … We just make you aware. Awareness is power. At that time,
when the power of freedom comes, you are alright. But when the power of
freedom goes away and sneakily the power of mind, intellect, or ego comes,
then again you are cribbed.
Sometimes when you hear, it clicks to you. When it clicks to you, you
are sure. Perhaps you write it down, saying “I’ll use this.” But the next
moment, the shop is closed and you don’t get it; not only it’s closed,
mangos or not available anywhere, the season is closed. [Laughter.] So
in the world of people, that is there. When we say “the world,” you immediately
think, “other than me.” Anything that is other than you is heavy on you.
But if you know Me alone is, then neither are you heavy on you, nor is
anyone heavy on you, because you are the Pure Being. Pure Being is Pure
Free Forever, Amaram Hum Madhuram Hum.
Daily you use these words as a mantr, but you think that mantr
is a fashion, that perhaps “I am disciple of some Guru, he has given me
mantr, and that will work.” It’s not like a needle that you can
use on a thorn. Mantr has no form. Mantr means releasing
power, the power that fights against your power of bondage. If it is more
powerful, then bondage-power cannot do anything. … Purification of the
mind is the target. You think this means the mind should remain just the
same and you should wash it. It’s not like that. Purification of the mind
is that the mind does not exist. Its presence is not there—existence or
non-existence will confuse you. Mind’s presence is not there. The moment
the mind comes, then identification comes. …You ask, “What should I do
when the mind arises?” Now in me is that the mind never exists. It’s not
there. It never arises. But you’re convinced the mind arises. So I’ll
give you the means how not to let it arise. What do I say? Whenever the
mind arises, just begin to repeat Amaram Hum Madhuram Hum. The
mind will get away. …
I said to Krishna, “You have understood this Research Finding. Read it
a thousand times.” It was an exaggeration. She will never read it a thousand
times. But I mean, “Read it a couple of times more.” [Laughter.] That
is why many people say that “Swamiji says so many things, but what should
I do?” … “What does Swamiji say that I can execute?” This is what we are
taught in school, that “Give me one thing, I’ll follow it.” But there
is no such thing as one thing. If you ask the ocean, “Give me one cup
of water, I can grasp it,” it cannot. For forty years I have been saying
that you are not even born. I have been speaking. And you say that I should
say one thing. I never say one thing. So she had the RF. I said that anything
that clicks to you, read it. …
Bert: … It appears to me that when you speak, something is opening up.
If it’s not happening in the words, then where is it?
Swamiji: We do not ask the flower how you are getting opened up. It just
opens. You cannot say how. It got opened. It is its nature. The same is
with human beings. A human being has to hear, and he gets opened. But
he’s such a big flower that keeps opening, keeps opening, keeps opening.
He’s never satisfied unless it is fully opened. Till then, have patience.
Practice. A man is praying to God, “Please give me patience, give me patience.
But hurry up.” … A human being has the possibility and potentiality that
“I can be better.” … Why should I remain a human being? Why should I not
own the whole universe as mine? Why should I only be a son? I should be
one with the whole universe. That is where Bert says, “When you talk,
something happens.” …
|